Joke of the day: If Reliability History is supposed to show how reliable my computer is, why is it that all the errors point to Windows 11 errors? 99 percent of the errors are related to something in Windows that f**ked up during the normal course of operations and the last percent is because of other software f**king up due to poor coding. That, to me, does not indicate a problem with my computer, that points to a problem with piss poor coding.
One of the biggest issues is with a piece of crapware called StiSvc which is used to connect to scanners and cameras. I rarely do either but there are days when this registers an error causing my computer's reliability index to drop ten percent. Why this should be gauged as a computer reliability issue and not a Windows reliability issue is beyond me. It can't even be considered user error as this user did nothing to cause it to f**k up.
Trying to solve this issue is another matter. According to the "experts" that troll the MS help pages, one should run SFC and a host of other nonsenseware that doesn't find any problems but you should run it because Windows tends to go for a shit after running for so many months. Maybe they meant minutes because this has happened shortly after a fresh install. Well, we all know that MS likes to point the finger outward indicating that there's a problem with the hardware or the user and never looking inward to see that they f**ked up.
Oh Well, more fodder for the bishing .
